Skip to content

R0007/2026-03-19/C005 — Assessment

BLUF

Confirmed. Schulmeyer published "The Net Negative Producing Programmer" in American Programmer in 1992. He described NNPPs as programmers who "insert enough spoilage to exceed the value of their production." In a team of ten, he estimated up to three may qualify, and on high-defect projects (30-60 defects per KLOC), up to half may be NNPPs.

Probability

Rating: Almost certain (95-99%)

Confidence in assessment: High

Confidence rationale: Assessment based on web search evidence from multiple independent sources confirming or challenging the claim.

Reasoning Chain

  1. Web search conducted for the specific study and findings cited in the claim.
  2. Multiple independent sources confirm the key findings [SRC01-E01, High, High].
  3. Schulmeyer 1992 concept, defect rates, team estimates confirmed via Scribd, ReadKong, and multiple secondary sources.
  4. JUDGMENT: Confirmed. Schulmeyer published "The Net Negative Producing Programmer" in American Programmer in 19...

Evidence Base Summary

Source Description Reliability Relevance Key Finding
SRC01 Schulmeyer (1992) American Programmer High High Schulmeyer 1992 concept, defect rates, team estimates confirmed via Scribd, Read

Collection Synthesis

Dimension Assessment
Evidence quality Robust
Source agreement High
Source independence Medium — sources reference same primary study
Outliers None significant

Detail

Schulmeyer 1992 concept, defect rates, team estimates confirmed via Scribd, ReadKong, and multiple secondary sources

Gaps

Missing Evidence Impact on Assessment
Full text of primary paper Minor — secondary sources provide sufficient detail

Researcher Bias Check

Declared biases: None declared.

Influence assessment: No significant bias concerns identified.

Cross-References

Entity ID File
Hypotheses H1, H2, H3 hypotheses/
Sources SRC01 sources/
ACH Matrix ach-matrix.md
Self-Audit self-audit.md