R0007/2026-03-19/C001 — ACH Matrix¶
Matrix¶
| H1: Claim accurate as stated | H2: Core correct, percentages approximate | H3: Materially wrong | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SRC01-E01: Study parameters confirmed (5 studies, 198 samples, 633,263 individuals) | ++ | ++ | -- |
| SRC01-E02: Power-law distribution finding confirmed | ++ | ++ | -- |
| SRC01-E03: Output concentration percentages not found in secondary sources | - | ++ | N/A |
Legend:
- ++ Strongly supports
- + Supports
- -- Strongly contradicts
- - Contradicts
- N/A Not applicable to this hypothesis
Diagnosticity Analysis¶
Most Diagnostic Evidence¶
| Evidence ID | Why Diagnostic |
|---|---|
| SRC01-E03 | The absence of the specific output percentages in any secondary source distinguishes between H1 (exact figures reported) and H2 (figures are approximations). This is the only evidence that differentiates H1 from H2. |
Least Diagnostic Evidence¶
| Evidence ID | Why Non-Diagnostic |
|---|---|
| SRC01-E01 | Study parameters are confirmed by all sources and support both H1 and H2 equally while contradicting H3. Does not discriminate between the two plausible hypotheses. |
Outcome¶
Hypothesis supported: H2 — The core study parameters and power-law finding are confirmed, but the specific output concentration percentages (30% top decile, >50% top quartile) cannot be verified as directly reported findings. They are plausible derivations from a Paretian distribution.
Hypotheses eliminated: H3 — Overwhelming evidence confirms the study parameters and power-law finding.
Hypotheses inconclusive: H1 — Cannot be confirmed without access to the full paper text to verify whether the output concentration figures are directly reported.