R0002/2026-03-13/C011/S05¶
WebSearch — Journalism Principles-Based vs Methodology-Based
Summary¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Source/Database | WebSearch |
| Queries executed | 2 |
| Results returned | 20 |
| Results selected | 3 |
| Results rejected | 0 |
Query¶
Query 1¶
- Terms: "journalism principles-based vs methodology-based OR rules-based fact-checking epistemology verification"
- Filters applied: None
- Results returned: 10
Query 2¶
- Terms: "ICD 203 probability language likelihood scale intelligence community"
- Filters applied: None
- Results returned: 10
Selected Results¶
| Result | Title | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| S05-R01 | LSE paper — contested epistemology | Academic research on journalism's epistemological status |
| S05-R02 | Graves (2017) — contested epistemology | Seminal work on fact-checking epistemology |
| S05-R03 | DNI.gov ICD 203 | Primary source for IC calibrated uncertainty scale (comparator) |
Rejected Results¶
[None — all relevant results selected.]
Notes¶
Two searches combined here. The first targeted the principles-vs-methodology question directly. The second retrieved the ICD 203 as a comparator — to verify that the IC does have calibrated uncertainty scales that journalism lacks. Graves (2017) is a key finding: describes fact-checking as having a "contested epistemology."