R0002/2026-03-13/C008/SRC01¶
ROBIS Primary Publication (Whiting et al., 2016)
Source¶
Whiting P, Savovic J, Higgins JPT, et al. "ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2016;69:225-234. PMC4687950.
URL: Not captured — experimental run
Summary¶
| Dimension | Rating |
|---|---|
| Reliability | High |
| Relevance | High |
| Bias: Missing data | Low risk |
| Bias: Measurement | Low risk |
| Bias: Selective reporting | Low risk |
| Bias: Randomization | N/A -- not an RCT |
| Bias: Protocol deviation | N/A -- not an RCT |
| Bias: COI/Funding | Low risk |
Rationale¶
| Dimension | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Reliability | Peer-reviewed, published in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. Tool development study with Delphi process. Widely cited. Tool adopted by Cochrane and WHO. |
| Relevance | Primary source for the ROBIS tool structure. Defines the three phases and four Phase 2 domains. This IS the tool the claim references. Exact topic match. |
| Bias flags | No concerns. Academic authors funded by research council. Transparent tool development process using Delphi methodology. |
Evidence Extracts¶
| Evidence ID | Summary |
|---|---|
| SRC01-E01 | Phase 2 covers four domains of bias in systematic reviews |
| SRC01-E02 | ROBIS has three phases total, not just the four domains |