R0002/2026-03-13/C008 — Self-Audit¶
Summary¶
| Domain | Rating |
|---|---|
| Eligibility criteria | Low risk |
| Search comprehensiveness | Low risk |
| Evaluation consistency | Low risk |
| Synthesis fairness | Low risk |
Overall risk of bias: Low
Detail¶
Eligibility Criteria¶
Rating: Low risk
Sources were included if they directly addressed the ROBIS tool structure, domain count, or phase organization. Targeted the primary publication and institutional tool documentation. No borderline decisions were required.
Search Comprehensiveness¶
Rating: Low risk
Two search rounds conducted: initial broad search (S01) and direct fetch of the primary publication (S02). The primary publication and institutional source both confirmed the four-domain structure. Secondary institutional guides (WashU, Harvard, Mayo, GWU) were reviewed but excluded as they added no unique evidence.
Evaluation Consistency¶
Rating: Low risk
All sources evaluated using the same scorecard dimensions. The primary publication and institutional source received consistent High reliability ratings. No differential treatment of evidence.
Synthesis Fairness¶
Rating: Low risk
The synthesis noted the three-phase structure as a minor nuance without overstating the concern. The claim's accuracy was confirmed while acknowledging the structural simplification. The distinction between "accurate" and "complete" was preserved.
Flags¶
No flags raised.