R0002/2026-03-13/C005/S04¶
WebFetch — Sterne Funding Argument
Summary¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Source/Database | WebFetch |
| Results returned | 1 |
| Results selected | 1 |
| Results rejected | 0 |
Query¶
- Terms: PMC10897924 (Sterne: why RoB should NOT include funding)
- Filters applied: Direct URL fetch
- Results returned: 1 (Successful)
Selected Results¶
| Result | Title | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| S04-R01 | Sterne — Why risk of bias should not include funding | Co-developer's defense of design choice |
Rejected Results¶
[None.]
Notes¶
Direct fetch of Sterne's published counterargument. Successfully retrieved. This paper is critical because it demonstrates the absence is deliberate and articulated, not an oversight. The fact that a co-developer felt compelled to publish a formal defense paradoxically supports the claim that the absence is "conspicuous."