R0002/2026-03-13/C004/SRC01¶
PRISMA Statement History Page
Source¶
PRISMA Group. "PRISMA — History and Development." https://www.prisma-statement.org/history-and-development. Accessed 2026-03-13.
URL: Not captured — experimental run
Summary¶
| Dimension | Rating |
|---|---|
| Reliability | High |
| Relevance | High |
| Bias: Missing data | Low risk |
| Bias: Measurement | N/A — descriptive web page |
| Bias: Selective reporting | Low risk |
| Bias: Randomization | N/A — not an RCT |
| Bias: Protocol deviation | N/A — not an RCT |
| Bias: COI/Funding | Low risk |
Rationale¶
| Dimension | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Reliability | Official PRISMA project website. Authored by the PRISMA Group, which developed and maintains the reporting guideline. Institutional source with direct authority over the content. |
| Relevance | Directly addresses the development history of PRISMA, including the role of Mulrow's research. Explicitly states the causal link from Mulrow to QUOROM to PRISMA. Exact topic match. |
| Bias flags | Self-reporting — the PRISMA Group describes its own origins, which may emphasize its own importance. However, this is low concern because the factual claims (Mulrow's study, QUOROM lineage) are independently verifiable. |
Evidence Extracts¶
| Evidence ID | Summary |
|---|---|
| SRC01-E01 | PRISMA traces origins to Mulrow's findings of major deficiencies in review reporting |