R0002/2026-03-13/C003 — ACH Matrix¶
Matrix¶
| H1: All sub-claims accurate | H2: Framework correct, count differs | H3: Material misrepresentation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SRC01-E01: Two-axis model confirmed | ++ | ++ | -- |
| SRC01-E02: Evidence axis confirmed | ++ | ++ | -- |
| SRC01-E03: Agreement axis confirmed | ++ | ++ | -- |
| SRC01-E04: Five confidence levels | ++ | ++ | -- |
| SRC01-E05: Seven primary likelihood terms | - | ++ | - |
| SRC02-E01: Seven + three = ten terms | -- | ++ | N/A |
| SRC02-E02: Full table with all terms | - | + | -- |
Legend:
- ++ Strongly supports
- + Supports
- -- Strongly contradicts
- - Contradicts
- N/A Not applicable to this hypothesis
Diagnosticity Analysis¶
Most Diagnostic Evidence¶
| Evidence ID | Why Diagnostic |
|---|---|
| SRC02-E01 | Strongly supports H2, strongly contradicts H1 — the standard count is seven or ten, not nine, which is the key differentiator between H1 and H2 |
| SRC01-E05 | Supports H2, contradicts H1 — seven primary terms does not equal nine |
Least Diagnostic Evidence¶
| Evidence ID | Why Non-Diagnostic |
|---|---|
| SRC01-E01 | Supports both H1 and H2 equally — confirms the two-axis model but does not address the likelihood count |
| SRC01-E04 | Supports both H1 and H2 equally — confirms five levels but does not differentiate on the likelihood count |
Outcome¶
Hypothesis supported: H2 — The two-axis model and five confidence levels are correct, but the likelihood scale count is not a standard "nine." Seven primary terms or ten total terms are the standard counts.
Hypotheses eliminated: H3 — No material misrepresentation. The framework is accurately characterized in its fundamentals. Eliminated with high confidence.
Hypotheses inconclusive: H1 — The nine-point count is defensible under one counting method but is not the standard presentation.