R0002/2026-03-13/C002 — ACH Matrix¶
Matrix¶
| H1: All sub-claims accurate | H2: Structural correct, "core insight" editorial | H3: Numerical counts wrong | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SRC01-E01: GRADE separates quality from strength | ++ | -- | N/A |
| SRC01-E02: Four certainty levels confirmed | ++ | ++ | -- |
| SRC01-E03: Five downgrade criteria confirmed | ++ | ++ | -- |
| SRC02-E01: Three upgrade criteria confirmed | ++ | ++ | -- |
| SRC02-E02: All elements independently confirmed | ++ | + | -- |
Legend:
- ++ Strongly supports
- + Supports
- -- Strongly contradicts
- - Contradicts
- N/A Not applicable to this hypothesis
Diagnosticity Analysis¶
Most Diagnostic Evidence¶
| Evidence ID | Why Diagnostic |
|---|---|
| SRC01-E01 | Strongly supports H1, strongly contradicts H2 — the primary source itself frames the independence of axes as central, not just the researcher's editorial characterization |
Least Diagnostic Evidence¶
| Evidence ID | Why Non-Diagnostic |
|---|---|
| SRC01-E02 | Supports both H1 and H2 equally — confirms the four levels but does not differentiate between the two hypotheses about the "core insight" |
| SRC01-E03 | Supports both H1 and H2 equally — confirms the five criteria but does not differentiate between the two hypotheses |
Outcome¶
Hypothesis supported: H1 — All four sub-claims are accurate. The "core insight" characterization is supported by the primary source's explicit framing.
Hypotheses eliminated: H2 — The primary source itself frames the separation as central, not just the researcher. H3 — All numerical counts confirmed by multiple sources.
Hypotheses inconclusive: None.