SRC02¶


Research	R0002 — Research Standards for AI-Assisted Writing
Run	2026-03-13
Claim	C001
Search	S01, S02, S06
Result	S01-R02, S01-R03, S02-R01, S02-R02, S06-R01, S06-R02
Source	SRC02

Secondary Sources Synthesis

Source¶

Multiple concordant secondary sources: Army University Press, intelligence.gov, Penn State University courseware, PubMed Central, BMBS.org, Quizlet student flashcards. Accessed 2026-03-13.

URL: Not captured — experimental run

Summary¶

Dimension	Rating
Reliability	Medium-High
Relevance	High
Bias: Missing data	Low risk
Bias: Measurement	N/A — descriptive references
Bias: Selective reporting	Some concerns
Bias: Randomization	N/A — not an RCT
Bias: Protocol deviation	N/A — not an RCT
Bias: COI/Funding	Low risk

Rationale¶

Dimension	Rationale
Reliability	Medium-High. Army University Press, intelligence.gov, and academic course materials all converge on the same facts. No single secondary source is individually definitive, but the convergence across independent military, government, and academic sources provides strong collective reliability.
Relevance	High. All sources directly address the tradecraft standards and probability scale. They provide cross-reference and verification of the primary source.
Bias flags	Selective reporting — Some concerns: Secondary summaries may simplify the official text, potentially reinforcing shorthand labels that depart from the precise official language. This was observed: student flashcards use the same shorthand as the claim.

Evidence Extracts¶

Evidence ID	Summary
SRC02-E01	Multiple sources confirm nine standards and seven-point scale
SRC02-E02	ICD 203 uses "Almost no chance," not "Remote," for lowest band