R0002/2026-03-13/C001 — Self-Audit¶
Summary¶
| Domain | Rating |
|---|---|
| Eligibility criteria | Low risk |
| Search comprehensiveness | Low risk |
| Evaluation consistency | Low risk |
| Synthesis fairness | Low risk |
Overall risk of bias: Low
Detail¶
Eligibility Criteria¶
Rating: Low risk
Sources were included if they directly addressed ICD 203 tradecraft standards or the probability scale. The primary government source (DNI Objectivity page) was prioritized. Secondary sources were included for cross-reference and verification. No borderline decisions were required.
Search Comprehensiveness¶
Rating: Low risk
Six searches conducted: initial broad search (S01), probability scale search (S02), two failed PDF fetch attempts (S03, S04), successful HTML fetch (S05), and name verification (S06). The primary source was ultimately accessed despite two failed PDF attempts. Both confirming and disconfirming evidence was found.
Evaluation Consistency¶
Rating: Low risk
All sources evaluated using the same scorecard dimensions. The primary government source and secondary sources received consistent treatment. Label discrepancies were identified and weighted appropriately regardless of whether they confirmed or complicated the claim.
Synthesis Fairness¶
Rating: Low risk
The synthesis explicitly identifies both confirmed and inaccurate elements. The claim is not simply marked "right" or "wrong" — it is marked as structurally correct with two specific label inaccuracies. The mapping table between claim labels and official descriptions provides transparent evidence for the assessment.
Flags¶
No flags raised.